MICCIAH CHANNEL: JULIE WINTER
Produced by Jon Child
Transcript of Program 117, 1989 [CC]
Some of Julie’s early work in channel from 1989 where Micciah discusses:
• The earth as a “feminine spirit”: Rather, the earth is androgynous and changeable. Its bioelectrical nature shifts. View Section
• Relationship of Spirit to plastic: The process of wresting an unnatural substance from a natural one lowers the vibratory rate of the life-force. Not good ecology: Spirit seeks to express unity; plastic “will take a very long time ... to return to the One.” View Section
• Expressing rejection lovingly: As we heal the “total ecology” of ourselves as planetary systems, we learn to say no to toxic situations. “Sometimes it is loving to be angry.” View Section
Micciah: We greet you all, dear friends.
Julie: We do greet you, indeed. This is Micciah Channel, and I’m Julie Winter. Micciah is an energy entity who works with me while I’m in trance, and while I’m in the trance state I have access to a point of view that seems to come from a non-physical realm. This series of programs is drawn primarily from videotapes taken during my regular classes. We want to expand our circle and include your energy and interest in our work.
I want to thank all of you who have been watching and who have written to me. And what you are going to see is me, with my personality and intelligence, awareness, go into an altered state. And while I’m in that altered state, I join with other energies, or another energy, and produce the personality of Micciah. I have, in that state, an awareness that I don’t ordinarily have. And I’m going to respond to questions that my classes have asked me.
----------
Micciah: We greet you all, dear friends. And we are most pleased to be with you and to share our energies with yours, and to add a voice to the growing chorus of voices, and of hearts, of people moving quickly and ever more quickly to find what is for them a truth.
And there are many, many varieties of spiritual truths, all leading to the same ... bed, or matrix, of vitality.
So, now: let us proceed with the questions.
Susan: Micciah, I have two questions. The first question is about the earth. And — I hear a lot that the earth is a “feminine spirit,” and as I understand it the earth is neutral. And I would like to know what you think about that.
Micciah: Well — it is extremely difficult to discuss, because your association with “masculine” and “feminine” has to do with your association with the biological reality of male and female, as well as the cultural reality. We would not say the earth is neutral so much as it is androgynous, if you wish to use that terminology.
However, since you do appear on the planet in the form of male and female, the planet itself, in its development and changing — in its cycles — appears as male and female, or with a dominance of one ... [whisper] ah ... whoohh! How to express this ...
[Aloud] The earth is not always the same, the same, the same, the same; yes? It changes, in very obvious ways as well as much more subtle ways. Let us say that the earth has a bioelectrical nature, and that that has shifted. Now true north is the north pole, but that was not always so. Yes? There have — there are layers which show that the electrical forces were once reversed, were once other. Is that correct?
Soooo — the bioelectrical nature of the planet, as an entity, shifts — just as if you were to have an incarnation as a woman and another incarnation as a man, and so forth. So, it is both and neither.
Is that clear?
Susan: Yes, it is.
Micciah: [Whisper] Good.
Susan: The second question is that in this group we feel that Spirit is evenly present. And that when people take parts of things from Spirit, like chemicals out of the earth —
Micciah: [Whisper] Yes ...
Susan: — and make them into, say, plastic. What changes that — there, in the relationship to Spirit, then? What’s the difference between the relationship to Spirit as it was originally created —
Micciah: Meaning in the sense that plastic is, ah — a petroleum product and petroleum is natural to the earth?
Susan: Well, originally — right. It was a petroleum product, and then man makes it into plastic, which is something that isn’t natural of the earth. What is the relationship to Spirit then to the plastic, as opposed to the relationship to Spirit to the petroleum?
Micciah: We understand. [Whisper] Just a moment....
[Aloud] It depends to some extent on what you have made. Natural substances are lively, the way unadulterated food is lively. Diet soda is not lively — it does not have, really, a life-force. If there were an inert substance that would be one of them.
[Laughter]
It has its — do you understand? We are speaking of bioelectrical fields. It, ah — sort of doesn’t have one.
[Laughter]
If you create, ah — a cinder, if you burn a piece of wood and you create ash, the ash has a life-force: it is the work of one thing upon another. If you create, ah ... hmm ... a product like plastic it is not enspirited, because of the way in which the life-force has been altered.
Now: the hallmark of the acceptability of an item, so to speak, ecologically, has to do with exactly what you have discovered: whether it is biodegradable, whether it can be born and die in the earth. Everything that is of the earth ... can be born and it can die. So — but when you create something that has a very low life-force (we are using the words loosely. You get the idea, yes?) —
Students: Um-hmm.
— it cannot die: there is no natural force to bring it back into the body of the earth or the atmosphere.
Now — just a moment.
When you break apart an intrinsic particle like an atom (a particle which exists in many forms — yes? — in everything. It is an elemental aspect, which has a strong life-force by itself). When you pull that apart, when you shred the life-force, you have enormous power of — what? Destruction. As well as other things.
In conceiving and creating products, conceiving and creating effects — the effect of destroying an atom, of breaking it apart, and making a bomb — in order for these things to support the totality of life on this planet, they must be ecologically checked. They must be able to be part of the life-force, of being born and dying; of a life-force and a bringing back and being born again.
You know that, ah — the toxins created from radiation are universally potent because they are composed from shredded elemental aspects of the life-force. Is this making any sense at all?
Students: Yes — um-hmm ...
Micciah: [Whisper] All right. [Aloud] We are trying to get it through this one, and it’s only partially successful. We think she is getting the general idea.
So, to go back to your question, Linda: if all of the individuals responsible for such creations — of plastic, of atom bombs — had an acquaintance with their inner guide, with the inner ecology, they would be prompted to make a check for what they were doing, what they were creating, to see if it could be part of the force of the natural cycle of being born and dying.
[Pause] Hmmm.... Radiation itself exists as part of the natural order of things, but it exists in a quantity that is tolerable to life.
Do you have any questions about this? It is a little ragged, the description. We will try to help this one to get it more clearly at a later date.
Jeannie: I have a question.
Micciah: Please!
Jeannie: It — seems like — as things get once removed and twice removed from their original natural source, then their life-force energy also gets stepped down.
Micciah: Yes. Diminished.
Jeannie: Okay — got that far. Ah — but —
Micciah: But it — yes. That is right. Because if you combine the life-forces of two things — fire and wood — you will get ash, which has its own — [laughing] intelligence —
Jeannie: Okay. So, I — I understood Susan’s question to be something in the direction of: if we make the assumption that plastic has less life-force than ash, because it’s one step removed from the process of natural — well, in this case, than petroleum, then — my question is — where does it go? Where does the stepped- down life-force go?
Micciah: It doesn’t go anywhere.
Jeannie: It’s not in the plastic. How did it get to be less from petroleum to the plastic? I understand that it is less. But how come?
Micciah: Because you create a third element, with an organizing field ... with a vibratory rate. It doesn’t go anywhere; the vibratory rate changes. It is like the vocal cords, Jean. The life-force has to do with pulsations. So you can raise the pulsations in something, or you can lower them.
Jeannie: I see —
Micciah: When you lower them they don’t go anywhere —
Jeannie: Right —
Micciah: — but you shift the vibratory rate.
Jeannie: Okay.
Micciah: When we were fooling around about diet soda, we would say the vibratory rate is very low. The vibratory rate in pure honey is ... [sighs; searches for words] ... consonant with, or congruent with, what will nurture. (Now, you can take too much of it; you can die of honey poisoning, you know — it depends on the way you use it.) But it isn’t — the life-force doesn’t go anywhere: it is a shift in its vibratory rate.
Jeannie: Okay. And — is that — that’s separate from (Oy! I’m getting into deep weeds!) — ah — that Spirit is equally present. Spirit would be equally present in plastic or in petroleum, but the vibratory rates would be different. Is that what you’re saying? ... No? That’s not it —
Micciah: Nn- — almost.
Jeannie: Okay. [Laughing] Maybe I should just stop there!
Micciah: [Whispering] All right!
[Laughter]
Micciah: When you create something that is out of the ecology — of the intelligence, the vast intelligence of the planet, the planet will find a way either to take care of plastic or take care of you.
[Loud laughter]
And possibly both. Because the ingenuity of the planet will begin to create something, sooner or later, that will eat plastic, so to speak.
Jeannie: Right.
Micciah: The vast intelligence that creates the planet is part of the planet itself.
But when you create a substance — let’s see if we can get a little closer! —
[Laughter]
— when you create a substance that is out of context with, ah — that which can ... hmmmm ... that which is congruent with the vibratory principles of the earth realm, then it is ... enspirited in a different way. It partakes less and less. Because Spirit needs to be — mmm ... hmmm ... Spirit is always seeking to express unity, and to return to the One. Plastic will take a very long time, in the dream of time —
[Loud laughter]
— to return to the One.
Jeannie: [Amid laughter] Okay.
Micciah: And the One, we assure you, will figure out a way to take care of it.
Jeannie: Yeah.
Micciah: Or you.
So.
Students: Hmm. [Laughter] Hmm. Okay.
Jeannie: Ah — now — you’ve answered the question that I was going to ask, so
Julie wanted to ask a question about: what would be a very loving way to take care of or experience or express rejection?
Micciah: Ah.
Jeannie: What is the healing aspect of rejection?
Micciah: Well, we will go back to the descriptions having to do with ecology, since we are now hot on the trail, and it is a model we have suggested that this one use in her teaching.
You, as an entity, or (as we said) you as a planet — the planet Susan or the planet Linda — have an ecology all of your own. Yes?
When you are faced in the emotional realm with a person or a situation that is potentially toxic, a pollutant — a situation that does not support the vitality of your own ecology — then the most loving thing you can do is reject it, is say no to that.
We are — this is an oversimplification. Let us see if we can become more precise.
Hmm ... hmm.... First of all, you need to become aware of what your true ecology is and what your rights are in the matter, both on a psychological level and on a spiritual level. If you have been abused as a child, if you have grown up in a disfunctional family unit, then your psychological experience of what you can rightfully expect will be damaged. And that needs to heal in order for you to correctly perceive the ecology of relationships. Until you reclaim your right to love and be loved, you are likely to be inappropriately accepting of abusive behavior, for instance. Yes? You have not yet healed the harmed ecology in the emotional field.
When you do that you will know, if someone behaves in an abusive way towards you, that you will want to push that right out — and say, “No, no! Um-um. No! Your behavior does not nourish my life-force.” Or, “MY behavior does not nourish my life-force. I am behaving toward myself in an abusive way, in a harmful way. I am coming to realize that this is not emotionally ecological. So — with love toward myself, I can say to myself: ‘No.’ Or to you: ‘No.’”
How to do it in a loving way: well — we will have to expand the notion of loving. Sometimes it is loving to be angry. We don’t want to leave “loving” in the limited definition of “nice ... nice.” To say no in a “nice” way — it doesn’t have to be nice. If it is heartfelt, it can be angry. And how to do this has to do with entitlement.
When you are not able to protect and nurture the total ecology of your being — when you are not able to do that — that is a signal that somewhere your sense of TRUE entitlement (not narcissistic entitlement; true entitlement) is — has been weakened. When it strengthens, as it strengthens, and you experience yourself more and more in the biochemistry of being a child of Spirit, you know you are beloved and precious and you are going to protect that. With love.
Is that clear?
Students: Um-hmm. Yes.
Micciah: [Whisper] Good....
So, we share with you all great blessings, and much love, and we bid you ... a very good evening.
----------
Julie: That’s the end of this particular segment... of this particular adventure. And this channeling is meant to be a spiritual, emotional, intellectual, heartful, mindful journey that I share with another realm, that I share with my classes and that we all share with you.
Please go over the material, evaluate it for yourself, and know what it is that you think about it.
Julie: “This channeling is meant to be a spiritual, emotional, intellectual, heartful, mindful journey that I share with another realm, that I share with my classes and that we all share with you. Please go over the material, evaluate it for yourself, and know what it is that you think about it.”